You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
Date | Description | Judge | |
---|---|---|---|
04/14/17 |
Kohner v. Pyper (2:17-ap-00079-DPC) 04/14/17 Under Advisement Ruling on Disposition of Funds Held by Chapter 13 Trustee Post-Dismissal |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
09/30/20 |
Parker V. Titan Mining (Us) Corporation Et Al (2:19-ap-00412-DPC) 09/30/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
03/28/18 |
Esteban Roberto Casillas, Sr. And Mary Louise Casillas (2:17-bk-12897-DPC) 03/28/18 ORDER |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
12/28/18 |
Reish V. Phoenix Heliparts Inc. Et Al (2:16-ap-00331-DPC) 12/28/18 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
07/21/23 |
TIMOTHY R GEIGER (2:17-bk-14599-DPC) 07/21/23 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER RE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEBTOR |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
10/25/19 |
Shaffer v. Amazon Services LLC (2:13-ap-00799-DPC) 10/25/19 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Regarding Discovery Disputes |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
06/02/14 |
Warfield v. Santander Consumer (2:14-ap-00173-DPC) 06/02/14 Holding: Defendant’s date of perfection of a lien relates back to December 14, 2013. Therefore, Plaintiff/Trustee’s rights and powers under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a), which arose on the Petition Date of December 18, 2013, are inferior to Defendant’s lien rights. See § 546(b) and A.R.S. § 47-9322(A)(1). Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
03/06/20 |
Kara Frances Jennings (2:18-bk-11759-DPC) 03/06/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING on Trustee's Motion for Reconsideration |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
06/06/13 |
Strata Title LLC (2:12-bk-24242-DPC) 06/06/13 Holding: According to Schedule 1 of the Tempe Tower, LLC Operating Agreement, on February 24, 2013, the Debtor's membership interests in Tempe Tower changed from 50% to zero and Pure Country's membership interests changed from 50% to 100%. The Court has been asked to determine if Schedule 1 is enforceable. Under Arizona law, parties to an operating agreement can contract, as the parties here did in Schedule 1, for changes in membership interests between the parties. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
05/04/17 |
Reish v. Phoenix Heliparts Inc. et al (2:16-ap-00331-DPC) 05/04/17 Under Advisement Ruling Denying the Reish Parties' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, and Partially Granting the Liquidating Trust's Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge Daniel P. Collins |