You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/14/10 |
Shawn D. Barron And Kerry G. Barron (4:10-bk-28871-EWH) 12/14/10 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 03/12/12 |
Desert Gardens Iv, Llc (2:11-bk-31061-EWH) 03/12/12 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 11/02/07 |
Itc Homes, Inc. (4:06-bk-00053-EWH) 11/02/07 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 03/30/07 |
Nortman Et Al V. Smith (2:06-ap-00373-EWH) 03/30/07 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 11/09/12 |
Trails End Lodge, Llc (4:11-bk-16190-EWH) 11/09/12 Memorandum Decision On Plan Confirmation |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 05/03/05 |
Sergio Renteria And Sandra L Renteria (4:02-bk-01943-EWH) 05/03/05 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 08/03/06 |
Seraph V. United States Dept Of Education Et Al (4:06-ap-00063-EWH) 08/03/06 Memorandum Decision on Debtor's Motion for Appointment of Counsel |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 11/09/12 |
Saunders Rudasill Hotel, LLC (4:11-bk-16202-EWH) 11/09/12 Holding: When evaluating competing confirmation plans, “the court shall consider the preferences of creditors and equity security holders in determining which plan to confirm.” 11 U.S.C. § 1129(c). Under both Debtor’s and Lender’s Plans, the existing equity holders would be replaced. As a result, only creditors’ preferences need to be considered when choosing between the competing plans. Accordingly, Lender’s Plan should be confirmed because it satisfies all of the required elements of § 1129 and provides for the best interests of creditors. Lender’s proposed 100% payment with interest offers better treatment to all creditors than Debtor’s proposal, which offers extended payment terms and exposes Lender (the largest creditor) to an unacceptable level of risk. |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 09/05/12 |
Mark Bond and Ashlea Bond (4:11-bk-33849-EWH) 09/05/12 Holding: Debtors’ Schedules and Plan undervalue their ownership interest in Old Chicago Deli as a going concern and violate § 1325 by failing to adequately account for all disposable income. As a result, the Court will enter a separate Order on this date requiring that Debtors calculate the going-concern value of their 70% interest in Old Chicago Deli and amend their Schedules and Plan to reflect this calculation along with the $20,000- $25,000 in additional annual income earned from Old Chicago Deli. |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) | |
| 02/15/12 |
Transwest Resort Properties, Inc. (4:10-bk-37134-EWH) 02/15/12 Memorandum Regarding Request for Entry of Written Orders Denying Motions for Relief From Stay |
Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired) |