You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/28/12 |
Krystal Energy Co. Inc. V. The Navajo Nation (2:01-ap-00171-GBN) 02/28/12 Order Approving Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to the Navajo Nation's Objections to Bankruptcy Court's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Request for De Novo Review and In |
||
| 12/14/04 |
Robert Ransom Horton (2:03-bk-15574-GBN) 12/14/04 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Final Order |
||
| 01/20/12 |
Krystal Energy Co. Inc. V. The Navajo Nation (2:01-ap-00171-GBN) 01/20/12 Order Granting an Extension of Time for Filing Objections to Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law |
||
| 09/02/05 |
Shank V. American Education Services/Slfc-Law (2:04-ap-00090-GBN) 09/02/05 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order |
||
| 11/17/00 |
Walter Lyle Randall and Sharon Randall (2:97-ap-11255-GBN) 11/17/00 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order |
||
| 06/27/02 |
Davis Chevrolet, Inc. (2:97-ap-12542-GBN) 06/27/02 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order |
||
| 09/05/06 |
Acer Et Al V. Carbray Et Al (2:04-ap-01207-GBN) 09/05/06 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order |
||
| 11/25/14 |
Sam Rei, L.L.C. v. Continental Group, LLC et al (2:14-ap-00319-DPC) 11/25/14 Holding: Plaintiffs’ allegations regarding Strojnik’s breaches of fiduciary duty to the estate and duty of candor to the Court, even if taken as true, are beyond the scope of special counsel’s required disclosure under Harris. To adopt Plaintiffs’ argued disclosure requirement would run contrary to the public policy rationale underlying Harris. The Court finds that Strojnik was sufficiently candid regarding its role as special counsel for the purpose of pursuing the Suit for the estate, that Strojnik acted within the scope of its appointment, that Debtor had notice, and that the Court approved its appointment. Strojnik is entitled to derived quasi-judicial immunity from Plaintiffs’ suit. The Complaint must be dismissed as to Strojnik. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 05/25/18 |
Robert W. Mangold And Michele M. Mangold (2:12-bk-16858-DPC) 05/25/18 UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING REGARDING POST-NUPTIAL AGREEMENT AND MICHELE MANGOLD'S LIABILITY TO THOMAS J. PICCOLO |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 06/18/15 |
Juarez v. Castellanos (2:14-ap-00726-DPC) 06/18/15 Order granting debtor's cross-motion for summary judgment. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins |