You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/06 |
Richard T Shaw (2:05-bk-11237-SSC) 03/31/06 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 08/26/04 |
The Don Luscombe Aviation Fndation, Inc. (2:02-bk-18352-SSC) 08/26/04 Memorandum Decision on Motion to Compel Return of Documents, Application for Order to Show Cause for Contempt and Motion to Dismiss (Deny) Renaissance's Motion re: Contempt and Separate Motion for Con |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 09/06/05 |
Davis Et Al V. Fowler Et Al (2:04-ap-01211-SSC) 09/06/05 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 10/30/06 |
Kush V. Kush (2:06-ap-00225-SSC) 10/30/06 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 03/24/10 |
Ford V. Garno (2:09-ap-00383-SSC) 03/24/10 Memorandum Decision Concerning Property of the Bankruptcy Estate and Turnover of Proceeds |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 10/21/08 |
Gates V. Johnson Et Al (2:08-ap-00189-SSC) 10/21/08 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 05/26/09 |
Fronterra Village Llc (2:09-bk-03099-SSC) 05/26/09 Memorandum Decision On Debtor's Emergency Motion Under 11 U.S.C. Section 362(d)(3) |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 02/22/06 |
Rodriguez V. Rodriguez (2:04-ap-00975-SSC) 02/22/06 Memorandum Decision |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 02/21/12 |
Birdsell V. Mgf Funding, Inc. (2:10-ap-02327-SSC) 02/21/12 Memorandum Decision Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) | |
| 12/05/12 |
First American Title Insurance Company, Inc. v. Cunningham (2:11-ap-00629-SSC) 12/05/12 Holding: the Court concludes that the Plaintiff has satisfied its duty under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b), incorporated into this Adversary Proceeding as a result of Bankruptcy Rules 7012 and 7009, to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and has stated with particularity the allegations surrounding the alleged fraud. The Court has cited to relevant case law that provides a basis for the particular facts alleged to be considered fraud, though still recognizing that certain cases cited by this Court are not binding, but merely provide persuasive authority. Because Plaintiff has met its burden under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b), the Court denies the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. |
Judge Sarah S. Curley (retired) |