You are here

Opinions

Email Updates - Click here to subscribe for automatic notices when this page is updated.

The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.

Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.

Date Description Judgesort descending
06/15/12 Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company V. Intergalectic Properties, Llc Et Al (4:11-ap-01312-EWH) 06/15/12

Amended Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law as to Motion for Summary Judgment

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
08/12/04 Francisco J Espinosa (4:92-bk-03819-EWH) 08/12/04

Memorandum Decision

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
09/05/12 Mark Bond And Ashlea Bond (4:11-bk-33849-EWH) 09/05/12

Memorandum Decision

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
03/07/11 Extra Room, Inc. (4:09-bk-03694-EWH) 03/07/11

Memorandum Decision

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
08/21/13 Sunset Professional Park,Llc (4:09-bk-32194-EWH) 08/21/13

Memorandum Decision

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
05/18/11 Us Corp And Its Federal State Of Arizona Employees And Aurora Home Loans Llc (4:11-bk-06731-EWH) 05/18/11

Memorandum Decision re: Dismissal of Involuntary Petition and Related Pleadings

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
07/29/10 Anthony Tarantola (4:09-bk-09703-EWH) 07/29/10

Memorandum Decision

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
08/13/14 Diversified Funding Group, Llc V. Hendon (2:11-ap-01972-EWH) 08/13/14

Memorandum Decision

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
03/20/13 Rizalina A. Morris (4:12-bk-15511-EWH) 03/20/13

Memorandum Decision

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)
06/15/12 North Summit Landing, Inc. v. Shih Et Al (4:11-ap-01470-EWH) 06/15/12

Holding: Plaintiff has not demonstrated that Defendants’ conduct constituted the use of a court process, therefore, they cannot demonstrate that Defendants committed the tort of abuse of process under Arizona law. Even if the Debtors’ conduct was a use of a court process, the evidence does not demonstrate that Defendants’ conduct met Arizona’s requirement that it be solely based on an improper motive. Accordingly, a judgment in favor of the Debtors will be entered this date. 

Judge Eileen W. Hollowell (retired)

Pages