You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
Date | Description | Judge | |
---|---|---|---|
11/18/19 |
Mackenzie V. Adams, Jr. Et Al (2:19-ap-00218-DPC) 11/18/19 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER on Motion and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
05/08/20 |
United Midwest Savings Bank Dba Midwest Business C V. Raiffe (2:19-ap-00098-DPC) 05/08/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
11/16/20 |
Landau Et Al V. Jocque Et Al (2:20-ap-00169-DPC) 11/16/20 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
07/25/14 |
Smith v. Leverton (2:13-ap-00232-DPC) 07/25/14 Holding: Denying both Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for reconsideration. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
07/15/13 |
Kelly William Sample And Kristy Lee Sample (2:10-bk-38373-DPC) 07/15/13 Order re: Absolute Priority Rule |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
02/29/16 |
Jeffrey Allen Cohen (2:14-bk-11079-DPC) 02/29/16 Under Advisement Ruling on Trustee's Motion to Quash AZDOR Levy (Related Doc # 92) |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
07/26/21 |
Parker V. Titan Mining (Us) Corporation Et Al (2:19-ap-00412-DPC) 07/26/21 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Regarding Titan Defendants' Motion Under Rule 56(d) for Additional Time to Conduct Discovery |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
07/15/13 |
Sample (2:10-bk-38373-DPC) 07/15/13 Holding: So long as there is not a contrary published opinion from the District Court of Arizona, this Court will follow the opinions of the Ninth Circuit BAP, whether or not this Court agrees with the reasoning behind the particular BAP decision. The BAP in the Friedman decision held that the absolute priority rule does not apply in an individual debtor’s Chapter 11 case. The rationale for its 2-1 decision is set out in the extensive opinion penned in Friedman by Bankruptcy Judge Clarkson. Although this Court tends to favor the dissenting decision of Judge Jury in Friedman, for the reasons stated above, this Court feels duty bound to follow the majority’s holding in Friedman. Accordingly, the objection to the Debtor’s chapter 11 plan based on absolute priority grounds is hereby overruled. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
06/24/14 |
Goernitz, Chapter 7 Trustee V. Kohner Et Al (2:13-ap-00199-DPC) 06/24/14 Order Denying Motion to Disqualify Kutak Rock LLP as Special Counsel to Trustee |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
03/14/17 |
Richard John Zivney, III (3:16-bk-07582-DPC) 03/14/17 Amended Under Advisement Ruling on Debtor's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Sustaining Trustee's Objection to Claimed Exemption |
Judge Daniel P. Collins |