You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/14/06 |
Aaron V. Abc Appliance, Inc. Dba Abc Warehouse (2:05-ap-00813-RJH) 12/14/06 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 10/20/11 |
Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc. D/B/A Summit Builders V. Arizona Control Specialists Et Al (2:09-ap-00424-RJH) 10/20/11 Opinion Denying Partial Summary Judgment re: Mechanic's Lien Priority |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 01/21/04 |
Dexter Distributing Corp. (2:03-bk-03546-RJH) 01/21/04 Memorandum Decision Denying Dellheim's Motion for Expedited Hearing on Motions to Change Ballots and Denying Debtors' Motion for Expedited Discovery |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 05/06/10 |
Gaughan V. Merchants T&F, Inc. Et Al (2:09-ap-01144-RJH) 05/06/10 Memorandum Decision Granting Trustee's Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 05/10/07 |
Diwan V. Seiter Et Al (2:06-ap-00200-RJH) 05/10/07 Memorandum Decision re: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 05/19/09 |
Regatta Bay, L.L.C. (2:08-bk-10838-RJH) 05/19/09 Opinion and Order Denying Stay Pending Appeal |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 09/29/05 |
Pierce V. Meador (2:05-ap-00151-RJH) 09/29/05 Memorandum Decision re: Cross Motions for Summary Judgment |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 12/10/08 |
National Retail Development Partners I, Llc V. Maness Et Al (2:08-ap-00780-RJH) 12/10/08 Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 09/27/12 |
Stone v. Central and Monroe, LLC (2:09-ap-00424-RJH) 09/27/12 Holding: On these facts, equitable subrogation is not necessary to prevent unjust enrichment of the contractors and subcontractors. To the contrary, even without equitable subrogation, the contractors will be paid far less than they are justly entitled to receive for their work, and it is entirely just and proper that Mortgages should bear a substantial portion of their loss, for which it is largely responsible in at least an equitable sense. The contractors and subcontractors are therefore entitled to a lien priority dating from October, 2005, and Mortgages Ltd. is entitled only to the priority dating from the recordation of its deed of trust on May 16, 2007. |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) | |
| 09/16/13 |
Ian Nehemiah Gray And Cynthia Jackson Gray (3:13-bk-08071-RJH) 09/16/13 Opinion and Order Sustaining Trustee's Objection to Claimed Exemptions |
Judge Randolph J. Haines (retired) |