You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/26/21 |
Parker V. Titan Mining (Us) Corporation Et Al (2:19-ap-00412-DPC) 07/26/21 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Regarding Titan Defendants' Motion Under Rule 56(d) for Additional Time to Conduct Discovery |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 06/24/14 |
Goernitz, Chapter 7 Trustee V. Kohner Et Al (2:13-ap-00199-DPC) 06/24/14 Order Denying Motion to Disqualify Kutak Rock LLP as Special Counsel to Trustee |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 04/05/18 |
Erling S. Calkins And Elaine S. Calkins (3:13-bk-08354-DPC) 04/05/18 UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING RE THIRD AND FINAL APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 12/28/18 |
Reish V. Phoenix Heliparts Inc. Et Al (2:16-ap-00331-DPC) 12/28/18 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 12/27/19 |
Stratton V. Tomaszewski Et Al (2:18-ap-00361-DPC) 12/27/19 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 06/02/14 |
Warfield v. Santander Consumer (2:14-ap-00173-DPC) 06/02/14 Holding: Defendant’s date of perfection of a lien relates back to December 14, 2013. Therefore, Plaintiff/Trustee’s rights and powers under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a), which arose on the Petition Date of December 18, 2013, are inferior to Defendant’s lien rights. See § 546(b) and A.R.S. § 47-9322(A)(1). Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 06/06/13 |
Strata Title LLC (2:12-bk-24242-DPC) 06/06/13 Holding: According to Schedule 1 of the Tempe Tower, LLC Operating Agreement, on February 24, 2013, the Debtor's membership interests in Tempe Tower changed from 50% to zero and Pure Country's membership interests changed from 50% to 100%. The Court has been asked to determine if Schedule 1 is enforceable. Under Arizona law, parties to an operating agreement can contract, as the parties here did in Schedule 1, for changes in membership interests between the parties. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 05/04/17 |
Reish v. Phoenix Heliparts Inc. et al (2:16-ap-00331-DPC) 05/04/17 Under Advisement Ruling Denying the Reish Parties' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, and Partially Granting the Liquidating Trust's Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 03/22/13 |
Swift Air, LLC (2:12-bk-14362-DPC) 03/22/13 Holding: The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed a motion to convert this chapter 11 case to chapter 7 for cause under §§ 1112 (b)(1), (4)(A), and (4)(B). The Court concludes that the Debtor has shown a reasonable likelihood of rehabilitation. Accordingly, the Motion to Convert is denied |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 05/03/19 |
Paul Charles Ray (2:18-bk-09137-DPC) 05/03/19 ORDER Denying |
Judge Daniel P. Collins |