You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/08 |
Merrick Bank Corporation V. Cardsystems Solutions, Inc. (4:07-ap-00046-JMM) 07/17/08 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 10/16/12 |
Daniel Patrick Poland And Misty Dawn Poland (4:12-bk-18417-JMM) 10/16/12 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 05/03/06 |
Richard F. Quintana (4:05-bk-08497-JMM) 05/03/06 Memorandum Decision Ruling on Matter Under Advisement |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 04/19/10 |
Lattig V. National Bank Of Arizona Et Al (4:09-ap-00219-JMM) 04/19/10 Memorandum Decision and Order |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 12/09/09 |
Morris C. Aaron, Liquidating Trustee For The First V. Wns North America, Inc., (4:09-ap-00381-JMM) 12/09/09 Memorandum Decision re: Cross Motion for Summary Judgment |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 10/11/05 |
Roman Catholic Church Of The Diocese Of Tucson (4:04-bk-04721-JMM) 10/11/05 Memorandum Decision re: Claim |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 06/12/08 |
First Magnus Financial Corporation (4:07-bk-01578-JMM) 06/12/08 Memorandum Decision re: Administrative Claim of Docusafe of Phoenix, Inc. |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 07/15/08 |
Smith V. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, As Trustee (0:08-ap-00100-JMM) 07/15/08 Memorandum Decision |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 09/20/10 |
Larry Gene Porter And Debora Denise Porter (4:10-bk-12565-JMM) 09/20/10 Memorandum Opinion |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) | |
| 11/06/12 |
Derusha v. Duncan (2:12-ap-00068-JMM) 11/06/12 Holding: Because the DeRushas are unable to satisfy all three prongs of § 1141(d)(3), their adversary complaint (No. 12-68) must be dismissed. The Defendants are entitled to summary judgment, as a matter of law. A separate order will be entered, granting the Defendant Duncans’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and dismissing the complaint. |
Judge James M. Marlar (recalled) |