You are here

Opinions

Email Updates - Click here to subscribe for automatic notices when this page is updated.

The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.

Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.

Date Description Judgesort ascending
08/19/15 Goernitz, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Kohner Et Al (2:13-ap-00199-DPC) 08/19/15

ORDER Denying Gammage & Burnham's Motion for Reconsideration (Related Doc 282)

Judge Daniel P. Collins
05/03/19 Paul Charles Ray (2:18-bk-09137-DPC) 05/03/19

ORDER Denying

Judge Daniel P. Collins
11/01/16 David Ray Turner (3:15-bk-14741-DPC) 11/01/16

Order Granting Stay Relief

Judge Daniel P. Collins
01/10/20 Gonzalez V. Selznick Et Al (2:17-ap-00336-DPC) 01/10/20

UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER

Judge Daniel P. Collins
05/26/20 WOLLNER v. Spanish Hills Condominium Association (2:20-ap-00045-DPC) 05/26/20

ORDER Granting Motion to Dismiss Adversary Proceeding

 

Judge Daniel P. Collins
11/25/14 Sam Rei, L.L.C. v. Continental Group, LLC et al (2:14-ap-00319-DPC) 11/25/14

Holding: Harris immunity extends to Ellett Law Offices and Ellett’s conduct while it was Chapter 11 counsel for Debtor. The same public policy considerations favoring immunity for trustees and court appointed attorneys in a Chapter 7 case also favor such immunity in a Chapter 11 case.  As to Continental’s Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs have standing to pursue their equitable subordination claims and Continental’s Motion is denied.

Judge Daniel P. Collins
02/07/19 Morris Anderson & Associates, Ltd. V. Redeye Ii, L.L.C. Et Al (2:14-ap-00534-DPC) 02/07/19

UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Re Motion in Limine No. 1 (Legacy Receivable)

Judge Daniel P. Collins
01/24/14 Scannell v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al (2:13-ap-00302-DPC) 01/24/14

Holding: The parties present an issue of first impression, namely, which has priority in Arizona: a restitution lien or a purchase money deed of trust? The Court concludes that a purchase money deed of trust against real property has priority over an earlier recorded restitution lien.

Judge Daniel P. Collins
11/16/16 Cruz v. Schmidt et al (2:14-ap-00018-DPC) 11/16/16

Under Advisement Decision Determining Dischargeability of Debt

Judge Daniel P. Collins
05/02/13 Two Brothers XI, Inc. et al (2:10-bk-23048-DPC) 05/02/13

Holding: Enterprise contends it is entitled to superpriority administrative expense claims because the adequate protection provided to it by the Debtors was insufficient to cover the actual decrease in the value of its collateral. Because Enterprise has not proven that its collateral decreased in value, the Court denies Enterprise’s Superpriority Application.

Judge Daniel P. Collins

Pages