You are here

Opinions

Email Updates - Click here to subscribe for automatic notices when this page is updated.

The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.

Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.

Date Description Judgesort descending
01/30/09 First Magnus Financial Corporation (4:07-bk-01578-JMM) 01/30/09

Order Granting Pima County's Motion to Alter or Amend and Vacating in Part the November 26, 2008, Amended Memorandum Decision

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
04/28/08 John J. Banks (4:07-bk-01119-JMM) 04/28/08

Memorandum Decision

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
09/26/06 Ricardo J Espinoza And Tabita Espinoza (4:06-bk-00399-JMM) 09/26/06

Memorandum Decision re: Order to Show Cause

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
06/13/12 Delbert C Hodge And Renee D Hodge (2:09-bk-26411-JMM) 06/13/12

Memorandum Decision

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
06/23/10 Aaron, Chapter 11 Liquidating Trustee V. G & J Development, Inc. (4:09-ap-01004-JMM) 06/23/10

Memorandum Decision

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
10/03/07 Jeff P Scott (4:05-bk-07811-JMM) 10/03/07

Memorandum Decision

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
10/29/09 William R Cope And Ruby Elizabeth Cope (4:09-bk-04215-JMM) 10/29/09

Memorandum Decision

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
03/19/08 Patricia Farnsworth (4:07-bk-02168-JMM) 03/19/08

Memorandum Decision

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
09/23/11 Todd Burch And Jennifer Burch (0:10-bk-18431-JMM) 09/23/11

Memorandum Decision

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)
12/14/12 Cusack (4:11-bk-32452-JMM) 12/14/12

Holding: If Mr. Turetzky believes that the confirmation order--which is now final--was procured by fraud, he is directed to 11 U.S.C. § 1144, which provides that this is the only way to set aside such an order. The time limit to file such a motion is 180 days from confirmation. § 1144. If the starting place for these disputes is to be 11 U.S.C. § 1144, then a full blown trial on the merits is required, not merely mounds of pleadings which are unsupported by either law, or affidavits sworn to under penalty of perjury.To cut through this bramble bush of unorthodox procedure, the court will quash all subpoenas issued by Mr. Turetzky, vacate the 2004 examination orders, and require all subpoenaed material to be returned--unread and unopened--to the sources from which it came. The court will also not go forward with having hearings on sanctions, contempt or fees.

Judge James M. Marlar (recalled)

Pages