You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/20 |
Warfield V. United States Of America Et Al (3:20-ap-00038-DPC) 07/17/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 05/02/13 |
Two Brothers Xi, Inc. And Two Brothers V, Inc. (2:10-bk-23048-DPC) 05/02/13 Order Denying Application for Allowance of Superpriority Claim |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 05/30/14 |
Cline (2:13-bk-19488-DPC) 05/30/14 Holding: Missouri’s exemptions are not restricted to residents of Missouri so long as Debtors are domiciled in Missouri for purposes of Section 522(b)(3)(A). Because Missouri has opted-out of the federal exemption scheme, Debtors must use the exemptions provided under Missouri law. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 12/24/20 |
Jordan Garcia And Cynthia Celene Bustamante (2:19-bk-06454-DPC) 12/24/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Re Cure of Post-Confirmation Defaults Through a Chapter 13 Plan Modification |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 09/20/21 |
Carter V. U.S. Department Of Education-Nelnet (2:20-ap-00111-DPC) 09/20/21 ORDER Granting The United States' Motion for Summary Judgment, ORDER Dismissing Adversary |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 05/15/17 |
Owens v. LSF9 Master Participation et al (2:16-ap-00140-DPC) 05/15/17 ORDER Denying Debtor's Motions (1) for Extension to File Appeal Pursuant to Rule 8002(d)(1)(B), and (2) Waiver of the Appellate Filing Fee in a Chapter 7 Case |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 09/18/13 |
Donovan et al v. HIRTH (2:11-ap-00474-DPC) 09/18/13 Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 11/25/14 |
Sam Rei, L.L.C. v. Continental Group, LLC et al (2:14-ap-00319-DPC) 11/25/14 Holding: Plaintiffs’ allegations regarding Strojnik’s breaches of fiduciary duty to the estate and duty of candor to the Court, even if taken as true, are beyond the scope of special counsel’s required disclosure under Harris. To adopt Plaintiffs’ argued disclosure requirement would run contrary to the public policy rationale underlying Harris. The Court finds that Strojnik was sufficiently candid regarding its role as special counsel for the purpose of pursuing the Suit for the estate, that Strojnik acted within the scope of its appointment, that Debtor had notice, and that the Court approved its appointment. Strojnik is entitled to derived quasi-judicial immunity from Plaintiffs’ suit. The Complaint must be dismissed as to Strojnik. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 05/25/18 |
Robert W. Mangold And Michele M. Mangold (2:12-bk-16858-DPC) 05/25/18 UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING REGARDING POST-NUPTIAL AGREEMENT AND MICHELE MANGOLD'S LIABILITY TO THOMAS J. PICCOLO |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
| 06/13/19 |
Arthur Benson Moore (3:18-bk-13222-DPC) 06/13/19 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Ruling on Trustee's Objection to Claimed Homestead Exemption |
Judge Daniel P. Collins |