You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
Date | Description | Judge | |
---|---|---|---|
02/29/16 |
Jeffrey Allen Cohen (2:14-bk-11079-DPC) 02/29/16 Under Advisement Ruling on Trustee's Motion to Quash AZDOR Levy (Related Doc # 92) |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
09/30/20 |
Parker V. Titan Mining (Us) Corporation Et Al (2:19-ap-00412-DPC) 09/30/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
03/14/17 |
Richard John Zivney, III (3:16-bk-07582-DPC) 03/14/17 Amended Under Advisement Ruling on Trustee's Motion to Compel Turnover of Non-Exempt Funds |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
02/07/18 |
Va Bene Trist, Llc (2:17-bk-00993-DPC) 02/07/18 ORDER Denying Debtor's Motion to Amend or Alter Under Advisement Ruling |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
03/07/18 |
Ronald A. Klave, Jr. And Sofia R. Klave (2:16-bk-14246-DPC) 03/07/18 UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING RE CONDUIT PLAN |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
07/21/23 |
TIMOTHY R GEIGER (2:17-bk-14599-DPC) 07/21/23 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER RE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEBTOR |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
10/25/19 |
Shaffer v. Amazon Services LLC (2:13-ap-00799-DPC) 10/25/19 UNDER ADVISEMENT ORDER Regarding Discovery Disputes |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
03/06/20 |
Kara Frances Jennings (2:18-bk-11759-DPC) 03/06/20 UNDER ADVISEMENT RULING on Trustee's Motion for Reconsideration |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
03/31/16 |
Edwards v. US Dept of Education et al (3:15-ap-00026-PS) 03/31/16 Under Advisement Order |
Judge Daniel P. Collins | |
07/15/13 |
Sample (2:10-bk-38373-DPC) 07/15/13 Holding: So long as there is not a contrary published opinion from the District Court of Arizona, this Court will follow the opinions of the Ninth Circuit BAP, whether or not this Court agrees with the reasoning behind the particular BAP decision. The BAP in the Friedman decision held that the absolute priority rule does not apply in an individual debtor’s Chapter 11 case. The rationale for its 2-1 decision is set out in the extensive opinion penned in Friedman by Bankruptcy Judge Clarkson. Although this Court tends to favor the dissenting decision of Judge Jury in Friedman, for the reasons stated above, this Court feels duty bound to follow the majority’s holding in Friedman. Accordingly, the objection to the Debtor’s chapter 11 plan based on absolute priority grounds is hereby overruled. |
Judge Daniel P. Collins |