You are here
Opinions
The District of Arizona offers a database of opinions for the years 2012 to current, listed by year and judge.
Judicial opinions from the District of Arizona, as well as other participating courts from throughout the nation, can also be accessed through the U.S. Government Publishing Office's United States Courts Opinions web page. To view judicial opinions on the GPO’s website, click here.
| Date | Description |
Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/07 |
Helen Howard Builder (2:05-bk-21148-CGC) 05/07/07 Under Advisement Decision re: Trustee's Motion to Compel Turnover |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 10/24/06 |
Murphy Et Al V. Wilkins Concrete, Inc. (2:06-mp-00013-CGC) 10/24/06 Under Advisement re: Motion for Assignment of Rights Under FRCP 69, Bankruptcy Rule 7069 and Arizona Revised Statutes |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 02/14/11 |
Carroll V. Gmac Et Al (2:10-ap-01982-CGC) 02/14/11 Under Advisement Decision Regarding Motion to Dismiss by Deutsche Bank Trust Company and GMAC Mortgage for Failure to State a Claim |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 10/30/01 |
William S. Davis and Linda L. Davis (2:00-bk-00250-CGC) 10/30/01 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 02/28/06 |
Stanley V. Mackenzie Et Al (2:04-ap-00817-CGC) 02/28/06 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Determining Debts Owed to Estate are NonDischargeable |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 08/03/05 |
Robert A Russell (2:03-bk-12950-CGC) 08/03/05 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law re: Glenn R. Jones and G. Schneider Holdings, LLP Settlement |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 12/27/12 |
Namwest, LLC et al v. Namwest-Town Lakes, LLC et al (2:08-ap-00860-CGC) 12/27/12 Holding: Although the Court has the discretion to grant attorneys’ fees because the claims arose out of contract, the Court denies the Namwest Parties’ applications for attorneys’ fees. The Kohan Parties’ factually complex claims had merit. The $640,000 fees requested would create an extreme hardship that would discourage others who believe they have oral contracts from bringing tenable claims. Furthermore, the fees requested are unreasonable, and the Court cannot determine if they are directly tied to the claims. |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 03/24/10 |
Hille V. Hille (2:08-ap-00485-CGC) 03/24/10 Under Advisement Decision re: Dischargeability of Debt |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 03/24/09 |
Birdsell V. May Et Al (2:08-ap-00112-CGC) 03/24/09 Under Advisement Decision Re: Turnover |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) | |
| 06/25/08 |
Remediation Financial, Inc. Et Al V. Steadfast Santa Clarita Holdings Llc Et Al (2:07-ap-00520-CGC) 06/25/08 Under Advisement Decision re: Motions for Summary |
Judge Charles G. Case II (retired) |